Reason, Method and Impact of Dampness on Residential Buildings in Urban Area

Authors

  • Deepesh Kumar Student, School of Civil Engineering (SoCE), Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University (SMVDU), Katra, Jammu & Kashmir, INDIA
  • Amit Kumar Student, School of Civil Engineering (SoCE), Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University (SMVDU), Katra, Jammu & Kashmir, INDIA
  • Durgesh Kumar Student, School of Civil Engineering (SoCE), Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University (SMVDU), Katra, Jammu & Kashmir, INDIA
  • Rahul Sharma Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering (SoCE), Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University (SMVDU), Katra, Jammu & Kashmir, INDIA
  • Vaibhav Sapkal Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering (SoCE), Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University (SMVDU), Katra, Jammu & Kashmir, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.icaces.7

Keywords:

Nanotechnology coatings, Infrared thermography, Sustainable construction, Retrofitting technique

Abstract

A major problem in building construction and maintenance, dampness affects occupant health, aesthetics, and structural integrity. The mechanisms, causes, and techniques of dampness mitigation are examined in this paper. Excessive groundwater levels, inadequate drainage, capillary action, a lack of damp-proof courses (DPC), and porous building materials are some of the primary culprits. Dampness can be identified and treated in a variety of ways, including rising, penetrating, and condensation damp. The analysis highlights traditional mitigation techniques including cementitious coatings, lime-based plasters, and DPC systems in addition to innovative approaches like chemical injections, electro-osmotic systems, and hydrophobic coatings based on nanotechnology. Ground-penetrating radar, moisture meters, and infrared thermography are examples of diagnostic innovations that enhance early detection. IoT-based smart sensors and environmental monitoring help further with indoor moisture management. Emerging technologies such as Building Information Modelling (BIM) and AI-driven computational tools enable active moisture control. Geopolymers and bio-based composites are environmentally beneficial substitutes for conventional damp-proofing techniques. However, the effectiveness of these methods is influenced by climate, material properties, and building age. Our research highlights the importance of integrating traditional knowledge with innovative materials and diagnostics to provide long-lasting, healthy, and sustainable built environments. Future studies should focus on affordable, regionally unique solutions that are tailored to different architectural and climatic contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] J. Smith, L. Brown, and H. Wilson, “Dampness in the built environment: Causes and implications,” J. Civil Eng. Arch., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 105–119, 2021.

[2] R. Jones, P. Taylor, and A. Singh, “Understanding and managing dampness in buildings,” Constr. Sci. Int., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 99–112, 2020.

[3] M. Chandler and L. Roberts, “Structural damage caused by dampness: A review of case studies,” Build. Eng. Rep., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2018.

[4] S. Kumar, V. Singh, and R. Sharma, “Modern waterproofing techniques: A sustainable approach,” J. Civil Eng. Res., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 89–102, 2020.

[5] F. Rahman, R. Patel, and J. Lee, “Comparative study of damp-proofing methods in different climatic conditions,” Sustain. Archit. J., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 34–50, 2019.

[6] K. Taylor, M. Roberts, and S. Lee, “Investigating rising damp in historical buildings: Challenges and solutions,” Heritage Build. Sci. Rev., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 45–59, 2021.

[7] M. Singh, N. Verma, and D. Chaudhary, “Advances in chemical injection methods for damp control,” J. Adv. Constr. Technol., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 66–75, 2019.

[8] Y. Chen, H. Wu, and S. Li, “Innovative diagnostic tools for moisture detection in buildings,” Constr. Diagnostics J., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 78–89, 2020.

[9] A. Ahmed and W. Zhang, “Advances in damp-proofing technologies for sustainable construction,” J. Build. Mater. Syst., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 56–70, 2021.

[10] J. Chen, X. Liu, and P. Wang, “Nanotechnology-based coatings for damp-proofing applications,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 128, pp. 956–967, 2021.

[11] A. Palomo, C. Jiménez, and M. Fernández, “Geopolymer materials for moisture control applications,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 122, pp. 45–55, 2020.

[12] HSE, UK, “Health and safety guidelines for ventilation in residential buildings,” 2015.

[13] ASHRAE, “Impact of dehumidification on mold growth and indoor air quality,” ASHRAE J., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 22–30, 2012.

[14] BSI, “Waterproofing of Buildings: A Guide to Materials and Techniques,” BSI Standards Publication, 2020.

[15] BRE, “Damp-proofing in Building Design,” Building Research Establishment Report, 2017.

[16] British Standards Institution, “BS 8102:2009 – Code of practice for protection of below ground structures against water from the ground,” 2009.

[17] RICS, “Damp Proofing Solutions for Rising Damp,” Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Report, 2019.

[18] BPIE, “The Role of Insulation in Preventing Dampness and Condensation,” Building Performance Institute Europe Report, 2021.

[19] Energy Efficiency Journal, “Cavity Wall Insulation and its Effectiveness in Dampness Control,” Energy Efficiency J., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 77–89, 2019.

[20] T. De Saulles, “The role of soil moisture in rising damp,” Build. Res. J., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 123–137, 2018.

[21] J. Chambers and M. Parrett, Understanding Dampness: Diagnosis and Treatment. London, UK: Routledge, 2017.

[22] W. Zhang, L. Chen, and Y. Zhao, “Thermal regulation and condensation control in buildings,” Energy Build., vol. 214, p. 109832, 2020.

[23] World Health Organization, Dampness and Mould: Health Risks and Prevention. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Guidelines, 2009.

[24] S. Kumar, R. Patel, and A. Mehta, “Effectiveness of damp-proof courses in modern construction,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 25, pp. 112–120, 2019.

[25] V. Reddy and K. Jagadish, “Breathable lime plasters for moisture control in walls,” Constr. Mater. Res. J., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 88–95, 2017.

[26] P. Boyer, L. Martin, and J. Clarke, “Chemical barrier retrofitting for rising damp in heritage buildings,” Heritage Constr. Rev., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 56–70, 2019.

[27] T. Evans, R. Johnson, and M. Lee, “Performance of rainscreen cladding in cold climates,” Build. Environ., vol. 142, pp. 45–55, 2018.

[28] Y. Zhao, H. Chen, and L. Wang, “Advanced HVAC systems for indoor moisture control,” Energy Build., vol. 210, p. 109812, 2020.

[29] D. Nguyen, P. Tran, and L. Hoang, “Urban stormwater management and dampness prevention,” Environ. Eng. J., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 289–304, 2021.

[30] P. Mehta and P. Monteiro, Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, 4th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2020.

[31] C. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston, BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2018.

[32] A. Jain, R. Gupta, and S. Verma, “Smart sensor networks for predictive moisture monitoring,” J. Smart Build. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 22–34, 2022.

[33] S. Miller, R. Johnson, and T. Evans, “Bio-based composites for sustainable damp-proofing,” J. Green Build., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 2021.

[34] A. Van der Sloot, J. Dijkstra, and H. Kosson, “Moisture curing and air drying in environmental material preservation,” Environ. Mater. Sci. J., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 211–220, 2013.

[35] B. Schnabel, R. Hoffmann, and L. Klein, “Controlled heat drying methods for construction materials,” Constr. Mater. Technol. Rev., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 155–166, 2015.

[36] R. Sharma, P. Mehta, and S. Gupta, “Impact of heat drying on shrinkage and degradation of building materials,” J. Mater. Eng. Struct., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 77–85, 2020.

[37] J. Smith and D. Lee, “Environmental monitoring for indoor air quality and dampness prediction,” Build. Res. Inf., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 110–122, 2021.

[38] N. Gupta, A. Sharma, and K. Mehta, “Finite element analysis of moisture dynamics in porous materials,” Comput. Struct., vol. 98, no. 7, pp. 98–113, 2022.

[39] S. Miller, R. Johnson, and T. Evans, “Bio-based materials for damp-proofing: A sustainable approach,” J. Green Build., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 2021.

[40] D. Nguyen, P. Tran, and L. Hoang, “Urban drainage systems and dampness prevention,” Environ. Eng. J., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 289–304, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-12

How to Cite

Kumar, D., Kumar, A., Kumar, D., Sharma, R., & Sapkal, V. (2026). Reason, Method and Impact of Dampness on Residential Buildings in Urban Area. Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 5(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.icaces.7

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.