Protecting Privacy with Image Processing: How Blurring and Masking Help Keep Us Safe Online
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.1.1.18Keywords:
Privacy Preservation, Image Blurring, Face Masking, Data Protection, Online SafetyAbstract
Because more people are using technological networks, it is now easier to share pictures that contain private information. PSNR, SSIM and a custom Privacy Preservation Score. Median blur, Box Blur (Average Blur), Pixelation and Masking methods to an array of facial images or license plates or background objects We measured how well they worked using we investigate the effectiveness of image obfuscation techniques such as pixelization, masking, and blurring in protecting privacy during online sharing for images. We were applied a certain range of filters, such as Gaussian blur, about identity theft, privacy and the unauthorized use of your information. In this work, Now people are worried The results show that Gaussian blur keeps things clear to the eye while also providing a good level of anonymity. Average blur, on the other hand, keeps the structural boundaries but may leave hints that help you figure out what the object is. Pixelation makes things more private by changing the size of the blocks, which is especially useful for organized elements. Masking methods give it is the highest level of confidentiality achievable because they eliminate of each identifiable knowledge. A glance at how people see images supports the idea that masking is an effective method to circulate pictures safely, regardless of whether it may not appear as good. The results show that there is no one best way to do things; instead, the choice should depend on how sensitive the information is and what the image will be used for. For social networking companies, application developers, and individuals looking to enhance digital safety, this study offers practical insights. While identification algorithms advance, it also emphasizes the requirement that more robust private measures which artificial intelligence cannot violate.
Downloads
References
Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2017). Deep learning with differential privacy. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference, 308–318.
Andrejczuk, E., & Wiliamowski, M. (2018). Face blurring techniques in privacy protection for visual data. Journal of Applied Computer Science, 26(1), 45–53.
Bashir, M., & Haque, M. (2018). Image obfuscation for privacy protection using pixelation and blurring. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science, 9(4), 112–118.
Borji, A. (2019). Pros and cons of GAN evaluation measures. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 179, 41–65.
Brkic, K., Sikiric, I., & Linden, L. (2017). Privacy-aware face recognition using blurring and low-resolution mapping. Pattern Recognition Letters, 95, 29–35.
Chen, X., Sun, L., & Mitra, K. (2019). Protecting identity in images using adversarial perturbations. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 28(10), 5212–5224.
Choi, J., & Medioni, G. (2018). 3D face de-identification. IEEE CVPR Workshops, 147–155.
Fan, X., & Wang, J. (2020). A comprehensive survey of image and video privacy protection. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(4), 1–36.
Gafni, O., Wolf, L., & Taigman, Y. (2019). De-identification using GANs. IEEE ICCV, 3917–3925.
Gross, R., Sweeney, L., de la Torre, F., & Baker, S. (2018). Face de-identification. International Journal of Computer Vision, 126(3), 343–365.
Hasan, M., & Khan, S. (2020). Privacy-preserving image transformation using deep neural networks. IEEE Access, 8, 18122–18135.
Hernandez, J., & Park, W. (2017). Automated face masking for privacy protection. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 48, 36–50.
Hukkinen, J., & Kinnunen, T. (2019). Impact of blurring on facial recognition accuracy. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 14(3), 673–684.
Jain, P., & Sahu, A. (2020). Pixelation vs. blurring: A comparative approach to privacy preservation. International Journal of Image Processing, 14(2), 88–95.
Li, Y., Lyu, S., & Su, C. (2018). Image privacy protection through adaptive blurring. IEEE CVPR Workshops, 123–131.
Liu, J., & Chen, Z. (2021). Survey on facial de-identification. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, 17(3), 45–68.
Oh, S., & Kim, J. (2019). License plate anonymization using hybrid blurring techniques. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 47, 72–81.
Qian, Y., Zhang, J., & Gong, S. (2018). Deep learning–based face de-identification. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 13(2), 356–370.
Ribaric, S., Ariyaeeinia, A., & Pavesic, N. (2018). De-identification for privacy protection in multimedia content. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 65, 24–35.
Sarkar, P., & Chaudhuri, S. (2021). Regional image masking using automated detection. Image and Vision Computing, 108, 104–114.
Shao, L., & Li, J. (2020). Privacy-aware image sharing using selective blurring. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(43), 32911–32927.
Wang, Y., & Gupta, A. (2017). Face recognition resistance using obfuscation techniques. Pattern Recognition, 67, 341–351.
Wu, Z., & Hu, J. (2019). Performance analysis of blurring filters for privacy preservation. Journal of Imaging Science, 13(2), 77–85.
Zhang, T., & He, X. (2021). Deep obfuscation networks for identity protection. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 23, 2235–2247.
Zhou, B., & Zhu, W. (2020). Masking and redaction in visual privacy protection. IEEE Access, 8, 160223–160235.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Khairi Salem Ahmed, Abdulhakim A. S. Baroud

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.








