Comparing System of Wheat Intensification with Normal Practices Under Different Levels of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer in Southeast Region of Afghanistan

Authors

  • Abdul Wahab Hekmat Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Paktia University, AFGHANISTAN.
  • Mohammad Daud Ahmadzai Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economic and Extension, Faculty of Agriculture, Paktia University, AFGHANISTAN.
  • Nazir Khan Mohammadi Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Paktia University AFGHANISTAN.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.2.2.27

Keywords:

broadcast method, SWI, RDF, FYM, growth, yield, quality, economy, wheat

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the influence of NPK and FYM under normal practice and system of wheat intensification (SWI). The soil of the experimental area was sandy loam with pH (8.4); and available N (117.3 kg ha-1), medium in available P (13.85 kg ha-1) and high in available K (270 kg ha-1). Mazar 99 variety of wheat was chosen for the study. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with 24 treatments combination and three replications on a plot size of 1.5 x 3 m. Different cropping system (Broadcast method of sowing and system of wheat intensification) and different levels of NPK (50, 75 and 100%) were taken in main plot. Different levels of farm yard manure (0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100%) were assigned to sub plot in a split plot design. Application of 100 percent RDF under system of wheat intensification significantly influenced growth and growth attributes of wheat at different crop growth stages. Application of 100% RDF under system of wheat intensification (SWI) registered significantly higher plant height (23.4, 52.3, 77.7 and 82.9 cm), and dry matter accumulation (60, 257, 753 and 964 gram) at tillering, blooming, flowering and maturity stages and number of leaves (1130.0, 1722.3 and 2020.8) and number of tillers (187.9, 280.2 and 310) of wheat was also registered higher in same treatments at tillering, blooming and flowering stages of wheat respectively as compared to rest of the treatments.

Different treatments of cropping system and different levels of RDF and FYM significantly influenced yield and yield attributes of wheat. Among the cropping system, M4 (100% RDF + SWI) registered significantly higher grain yield (3794.3 kg ha-1) and straw yield (6096.8 kg ha-1) as compared to rest of the treatments. Application of 100 percent farm yard manure recorded significant and maximum grain yield (3553.7 kg ha-1) as compared to rest of the treatments. While, the minimum grain yield (3060.8 kg ha-1) was recorded in S1 due to application of 0% FYM. Similarly, application of 100 percent farm yard manure recorded significantly higher straw yield (5935.5 kg ha-1) as compared to rest of the treatments. However, the lower grain yield (3060.8 kg ha-1) and straw yield (5373.4 kg ha-1) was observed in S1 due to application of zero percent farm yard manure. The interaction of 100% RDF + SWI with 100 % FYM showed highest grain yield (4060.0 kg ha-1) and straw yield (6450.0 kg ha-1) as compared to rest of the treatments. vOn the basis of economic analysis it is concluded that wheat cv. ‘Mazar 99’ sown under system of wheat intensification treated by 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (120-60-60 kg NPK/ha) accompanied with 20% N through FYM proved to be the most remunerative dose which will increase the grain yield of wheat by 33 percent as compared to M1S1 due to application of 100% RDF + 0% FYM under broadcast method of sowing. However, SWI will increase the net return by 36 percent as compared to broadcast method of sowing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bakht, Jehan, Ziaul, Qamer, Shafi, Mohammad, Akber, Habib, Masood-ur-Rahman, Ahmad, Nazir and Khan, M, Javed Response of different wheat variety to various row spacing. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 23, 4, 2007.

Bali, SV, Mudgal, SC, and Gupta, RD, Effect of recycling of organic wastes on ricewheat rotation under alfisol soil conditions of North-western Himalayas, Himachal Journal of Agriculture Research, 12(2): 98-107, 1986.

Baloch, MS, Shah, ITH, Nadim, MA, Khan, MI, and Khakwani, AA, Effect of seeding density and planting time on growth and yield attributes of wheat, Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 20(4): 239–40, 2010.

Chauhan, DS, Sharma, RK, Khrub, AS, Tripathi, SC, Chokkar, RS and Nagarajan, S, Effect of nitrogen levels and seed rates on the productivity of wheat under FIRB System, All India Coordinated Wheat Improvement Programme Progress Report, DWR, Karnal, Haryana, India, 2000.

Gupta, Meenakshi, Bali, Amarjit S, Sharma, BC, Kachroo, D and Bharat Rajeev, Productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under various tillage and fertilizer management practices, Indian Journal of Agronomy, 52 (2) : 127-130, 2007

Hekmat, AW, Mohammadi, NK, and Nagaraju. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on growth, yield and economic of soybean under rainfed condition, Qalam Academic Research Journal, 5(2): 37-44, 2017.

Hussain, I, Khan MA and Ahmad, K, Effect of row spacing on the grain yield and the yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Pakistan Journal Agronomy, 2(3), 153–159, 2003.

Jat, Kumar, Lokesh, Singh, SK, Latare, AM, Singh, RS and Patel, CB, Effect of dates of sowing and fertilizer on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in an Inceptisol of Varanasi, Indian Journal of Agronomy, 58(4): 611-614, 2013.

Jat, LN, and Singhi, SM, Growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under different planting pattern or cropping systems and varieties, Indian Journal of Agronomy, 49(2), 111-113, 2004.

Kler, DS and Bains, DS, Effect of sowing patterns on growth, development, microclimate and yield of durum wheat (Tritcum durum Desf.). Environment and Ecology, 10 (3), 499-506, 1992.

Kumar, A, Chowdhury, S, Pandey, IB and Faruqui, OR, Performance of wheat varieties under Furrow Irrigated Raised Bed-planting system (FIRBS) in sandy loam soil of North Bihar, Annals of Agricultural Research, 25(1):52-55, 2004.

Kumar, Alok, Tripathi, HP and Yadav, DS, Correcting nutrient for sustainable crop production, Indian Journal of Fertilizers, 2(11), 37–44, 2010.

Pandey, IB and Dwivedi, DK, Effect of planting pattern and weed-control methods on weed growth and performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum), Indian Journal of Agronomy, 52(3): 235-238, 2007

Pandey, IB, Dwivedi, DK and Prakash, SC, Impact of method and levels of fertilizer application and weed management on nutrient economy and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum), Indian Journal of Agronomy, 51(3), 193-198, 2006.

Patil, PV, Chalwade, PB, Solanke, AS and Kulkarni, VK, Effect of fly ash and FYM on physico-chemical properties of vertisols, Journal of Soils and Crops, 13(1), 59–64, 2003.

Ramakrishna, Y, Subedar, Singh and Parihar, SS, Influence of irrigation regime andnitrogen management on productivity, nitrogen uptake and water use by rice (Oryza sativa), Indian Journal of Agronomy, 52(3), 102-106, 2007.

Sameem, A, Niaz, A and Anjum, FM, Chemical composition of three wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties as affected by NPK doses, International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 4(4): 537-539, 2002.

Singh, G, Singh, OP, Yadav, RA and Singh, RS, Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to planting methods, seed rate and fertility in late sown condition, Indian Journal of Agronomy, 2, (28), 195-199, 1993.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-11

How to Cite

Hekmat, A. W., Ahmadzai, M. D., & Mohammadi, N. K. (2023). Comparing System of Wheat Intensification with Normal Practices Under Different Levels of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer in Southeast Region of Afghanistan. Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 2(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.2.2.27

Issue

Section

Articles