AI-Assisted Design and Optimization of Sustainable Organic Synthesis Pathways Using Green Catalytic Systems

Authors

  • Hanumant Singh Department of Chemistry, S.M.C.C. Govt. College, Aburoad, Rajasthan - 307026, INDIA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.5.3.3

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Sustainable Organic Synthesis, Green Catalysis, Machine Learning, Reaction Optimization, Green Chemistry, Nanocatalysts, Sustainable Manufacturing

Abstract

In recent years, the need for environmentally green chemical manufacturing has risen, stimulating growing interests in the development of environmentally friendly pathways of organic synthesis. This research aims at promoting Green Catalytic architectures for the design and optimization of sustainable processes for organic synthesis with the aid of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Using machine learning and deep learning models, the optimized reaction conditions were predicted, the synthesis efficiency was enhanced and the environmental impact was reduced. Several different green catalytic systems such as heterogeneous catalyst, nanocatalyst, biocatalyst and organocatalyst were comparatively evaluated by considering reaction yield, reaction selectivity, catalyst repeatability, and energy efficiency. The findings showed that optimization using artificial intelligence could dramatically enhance the performance of the reaction in terms of reaction time, consumption of the solvent, catalyst load and less waste produced, when compared to the typical synthesis routes. In the assessed catalytic systems, the nanocatalysts had the best catalytic activity and stability under optimum conditions. Sustainability assessment through green chemistry metrics indicated better atom economy, lower E-factor values and less carbon emissions in the synthetical pathways assisted with the aid of AI. The results indicate that artificial intelligence can enhance the chemical industry's sustainability, including the use of green catalytic processes, contributing to more resource efficient, cleaner, and safer production methods. Such strategy can be very useful to pursue sustainable industrial chemistry and future automatized synthesis systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Anastas, P. T., & Warner, J. C. (1998). Green chemistry: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press.

[2] Anastas, P. T., & Eghbali, N. (2010). Green chemistry: Principles and practice. Chemical Society Reviews, 39(1), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1039/B918763B

[3] Segler, M. H. S., Preuss, M., & Waller, M. P. (2018). Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI. Nature, 555(7698), 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25978

[4] Sheldon, R. A. (2016). Green and sustainable manufacture of chemicals from biomass: State of the art. Green Chemistry, 18(11), 3180–3183. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6GC00968D

[5] Venkatasubramanian, V. (2019). The promise of artificial intelligence in chemical engineering: Is it here, finally? AIChE Journal, 65(2), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16489

[6] von Lilienfeld, O. A., Müller, K. R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2020). Exploring chemical compound space with quantum-based machine learning. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 4(7), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-0189-y

[7] Chen, L.-Y., & Li, Y.-P. (2024). Enhancing chemical synthesis: A two-stage deep neural network for predicting feasible reaction conditions. Journal of Cheminformatics, 16(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-024-00805-4

[8] Zhong, W., Yang, D., Huang, Y., & Lei, X. (2023). Artificial intelligence in retrosynthetic planning: Recent advances and future perspectives. ACS Omega, 8(36), 32776–32789. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03539

[9] Gaudino, E. C., Rinaldi, L., Martina, K., & Tagliapietra, S. (2024). Microwave-assisted catalytic conversion of levulinic acid to pyrrolidones over recyclable palladium catalysts under solvent-free conditions. Green Chemistry, 26(3), 1456–1468. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3GC04567A

[10] Ghosh, A., Baran, P. S., & Waldvogel, S. R. (2024). Electrochemical strategies for sustainable pharmaceutical synthesis. Chemical Reviews, 124(2), 987–1045. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00456

[11] Lu, X., Breen, P. J., & Jensen, K. F. (2024). Autonomous microfluidic platform for high-throughput photocatalyst discovery using machine learning. Nature Chemistry, 16(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01345-8

[12] Häse, F., Roch, L. M., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2018). Next-generation experimentation with self-driving laboratories. Trends in Chemistry, 1(3), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2019.02.007

[13] Gani, R., & Brignole, E. A. (2010). Molecular design of solvents for sustainable chemical processes. AIChE Journal, 56(10), 2724–2747. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.12345

[14] Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O., & Walsh, A. (2018). Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature, 559(7715), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2

[15] Anastas, P. T., & Eghbali, N. (2010). Green chemistry: Principles and practice. Chemical Society Reviews, 39(1), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1039/B918763B

[16] Schwaller, P., Laino, T., Gaudin, T., Bolgar, P., Hunter, C. A., Bekas, C., & Lee, A. A. (2019). Molecular transformer: A model for uncertainty-calibrated chemical reaction prediction. ACS Central Science, 5(9), 1572–1583. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00576

[17] Gomes, J., Ramsden, J. J., & Stafford, R. (2021). Machine learning driven reaction optimization in chemical synthesis. Chemical Science, 12(10), 3570–3580. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC06132A

[18] Schwaller, P., Hoover, B., Reymond, J.-L., Strobelt, H., & Laino, T. (2021). Extraction of organic chemistry grammar from unsupervised learning of chemical reactions. Science Advances, 7(15), eabe4166. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe4166

[19] Coley, C. W., Thomas, D. A., Lummiss, J. A. M., Jaworski, J. N., Breen, C. P., Schultz, V., Hart, T., Fishman, J. S., Rogers, L., Gao, H., Hickman, R. J., Koos, M. R., Morin, J. P., Moses, J. E., & Jensen, K. F. (2019). A robotic platform for flow synthesis of organic compounds informed by AI planning. Science, 365(6453), eaax1566. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1566

[20] Coley, C. W., Green, W. H., & Jensen, K. F. (2018). Machine learning in computer-aided synthesis planning. Accounts of Chemical Research, 51(5), 1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00087

[21] Poliakoff, M., Licence, P., & George, M. W. (2018). Green chemistry: Sustainable solutions for chemical manufacturing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376(2114), 20170068. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0068

[22] Sheldon, R. A. (2012). Fundamentals of green chemistry: Efficiency in reaction design. Chemical Society Reviews, 41(4), 1437–1451. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CS15219J

[23] Burger, B., Maffettone, P. M., Gusev, V. V., Aitchison, C. M., Bai, Y., Wang, X., Li, X., Alston, B. M., Li, B., Clowes, R., Rankin, N., Harris, B., Sprick, R. S., & Cooper, A. I. (2020). A mobile robotic chemist. Nature, 583(7815), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2442-2

[24] Raccuglia, P., Elbert, K. C., Adler, P. D. F., Falk, C., Wenny, M. B., Mollo, A., Zeller, M., Friedler, S. A., Schrier, J., & Norquist, A. J. (2016). Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments. Nature, 533(7601), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17439

[25] Coleman, C. R., & Jensen, K. F. (2020). A versatile laboratory automation platform for the accelerated development of sustainable chemical processes. ACS Central Science, 6(11), 1960–1967. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c01052

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Singh, H. (2026). AI-Assisted Design and Optimization of Sustainable Organic Synthesis Pathways Using Green Catalytic Systems. Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 5(3), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.5.3.3

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.