A Review of the Application of Metal-Organic Frameworks in the Absorption, Storage and Release of Methane

Mohammad Taieb Poya; Fazlulhaq Fazl

doi:10.55544/jrasb.2.6.35

Authors

Mohammad Taieb Poya Department of Lecturer at Chemistry, Ghor University, AFGHANISTAN. https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8760-9571
Fazlulhaq Fazl Department of Lecturer at Chemistry, Ghor University, AFGHANISTAN.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.2.6.35

Keywords:

metal-organic frameworks, storage, methane, Porosity

Abstract

Natural gas, which mainly consists of methane, is a good fuel for vehicles. Metal-organic frameworks (MOF) have attracted much attention as a new group of adsorbent materials in natural gas storage. MOF structures form various networks by connecting secondary structural units composed of metal ions and organic binders. These regular materials have high porosity and have high design capabilities. This feature has made MOFs suitable for special applications in trapping and absorbing various materials. The investigation of these materials has focused on the absorption of pure methane, although natural gas contains a small amount of larger hydrocarbons such as ethane and propane, which have greater absorption than methane. This Manuscript presents an overview of the current state of the metal-organic framework for methane storage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Kitagawa, S., R. Kitaura, and S.i. Noro, Functional porous coordination polymers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2004. 43(18): p. 2334-2375.

Binnemans, K., Lanthanide-based luminescent hybrid materials. Chemical reviews, 2009. 109(9): p. 4283-4374.

Akhbari, K. and A. Morsali, Modulating methane storage in anionic nano-porous MOF materials via post-synthetic cation exchange process. Dalton Transactions, 2013. 42(14): p. 4786-4789.

Noori, Y. and K. Akhbari, Post-synthetic ion-exchange process in nanoporous metal–organic frameworks; an effective way for modulating their structures and properties. RSC advances, 2017. 7(4): p. 1782-1808.

Rostamnia, S., H. Alamgholiloo, and X. Liu, Pd-grafted open metal site copper-benzene-1, 4-dicarboxylate metal organic frameworks (Cu-BDC MOF’s) as promising interfacial catalysts for sustainable Suzuki coupling. Journal of colloid and interface science, 2016. 469: p. 310-317.

Rostamnia, S. and A. Morsali, Basic isoreticular nanoporous metal–organic framework for Biginelli and Hantzsch coupling: IRMOF-3 as a green and recoverable heterogeneous catalyst in solvent-free conditions. RSC advances, 2014. 4(21): p. 10514-10518.

Abbasi, A.R., et al., Methyl orange removal from wastewater using [Zn 2 (oba) 2 (4-bpdh)]· 3DMF metal–organic frameworks nanostructures. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, 2015. 25: p. 1582-1589.

Barbour, L.J., Crystal porosity and the burden of proof. Chemical communications, 2006(11): p. 1163-1168.

McKeown, N.B., Nanoporous molecular crystals. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2010. 20(47): p. 10588-10597.

Rudd, N.D., et al., Metal-organic frameworks: functional luminescent and photonic materials for sensing applications. 2017.

Amooghin, A.E., et al., Fluorinated metal–organic frameworks for gas separation. Chemical Society Reviews, 2022.

Takamizawa, S., Nanoporosity, gas storage, gas sensing. Making Crystals by Design: Methods, Techniques and Applications, 2006: p. 315-339.

Sing, K.S., Adsorption, surface area, and porosity. 1967: Academic press.

Hu, Z., Y. Wang, and D. Zhao, The chemistry and applications of hafnium and cerium (IV) metal–organic frameworks. Chemical Society Reviews, 2021. 50(7): p. 4629-4683.

Plévert, J., et al., A flexible germanate structure containing 24-ring channels and with very low framework density. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2001. 123(50): p. 12706-12707.

Kaneko, K. and C. Ishii, Superhigh surface area determination of microporous solids. Colloids and surfaces, 1992. 67: p. 203-212.

Brunauer, S., et al., On a theory of the van der Waals adsorption of gases. Journal of the American Chemical society, 1940. 62(7): p. 1723-1732.

Férey, G., et al., A chromium terephthalate-based solid with unusually large pore volumes and surface area. Science, 2005. 309(5743): p. 2040-2042.

Batten, S.R., S.M. Neville, and D.R. Turner, Coordination polymers: design, analysis and application. 2008: Royal Society of Chemistry.

Ockwig, N.W., et al., Reticular chemistry: occurrence and taxonomy of nets and grammar for the design of frameworks. Accounts of chemical research, 2005. 38(3): p. 176-182.

Suh, M.P., Y.E. Cheon, and E.Y. Lee, Syntheses and functions of porous metallosupramolecular networks. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2008. 252(8-9): p. 1007-1026.

Rowsell, J.L. and O.M. Yaghi, Metal–organic frameworks: a new class of porous materials. Microporous and mesoporous materials, 2004. 73(1-2): p. 3-14.

Zhou, W., et al., Hydrogen and methane adsorption in metal− organic frameworks: a high-pressure volumetric study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2007. 111(44): p. 16131-16137.

Bobbitt, N.S., J. Chen, and R.Q. Snurr, High-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks for hydrogen storage at cryogenic temperature. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016. 120(48): p. 27328-27341.

Senkovska, I. and S. Kaskel, High pressure methane adsorption in the metal-organic frameworks Cu3 (btc) 2, Zn2 (bdc) 2dabco, and Cr3F (H2O) 2O (bdc) 3. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2008. 112(1-3): p. 108-115.

Senkovska, I. and S. Kaskel, High pressure methane adsorption in the metal-organic frameworks Cu3(btc)2, Zn2(bdc)2dabco, and Cr3F(H2O)2O(bdc)3. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2008. 112(1): p. 108-115.

Seki, K., Design of an adsorbent with an ideal pore structure for methane adsorption using metal complexes. Chemical communications, 2001(16): p. 1496-1497.

Fu, J., et al., Density functional methods for fast screening of metal–organic frameworks for hydrogen storage. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015. 119(10): p. 5374-5385.

Peng, Y., et al., Methane storage in metal–organic frameworks: current records, surprise findings, and challenges. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013. 135(32): p. 11887-11894.

Fernandez, M., et al., Large-scale quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) analysis of methane storage in metal–organic frameworks. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013. 117(15): p. 7681-7689.

Koh, H.S., et al., Predicting methane storage in open-metal-site metal–organic frameworks. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015. 119(24): p. 13451-13458.

Lozano-Castello, D., et al., Advances in the study of methane storage in porous carbonaceous materials. Fuel, 2002. 81(14): p. 1777-1803.

Mason, J.A., M. Veenstra, and J.R. Long, Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for natural gas storage. Chemical Science, 2014. 5(1): p. 32-51.

He, Y., et al., Methane storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014. 43(16): p. 5657-5678.

Makal, T.A., et al., Methane storage in advanced porous materials. Chemical Society Reviews, 2012. 41(23): p. 7761-7779.

He, Y., R. Krishna, and B. Chen, Metal–organic frameworks with potential for energy-efficient adsorptive separation of light hydrocarbons. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012. 5(10): p. 9107-9120.

Zhang, H., et al., A thermodynamic tank model for studying the effect of higher hydrocarbons on natural gas storage in metal–organic frameworks. Energy & Environmental Science, 2015. 8(5): p. 1501-1510.