Current Status and Future Perspective on Enzyme Involving in Biocontrol of Plant Pathogen

Authors

  • Gurmeet Singh Department of Biology, Baba Farid University, Punjab, INDIA.
  • Tarun Kapoor Department of Biology, Baba Farid University, Punjab, INDIA.
  • Harpreet Kaur Department of Biology, Baba Farid University, Punjab, INDIA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.1.1.3

Keywords:

Enzyme, Biocontrol, bacteria, Plant Pathogen, ecosystems, crop diseases, fungicides

Abstract

Plant diseases must be controlled to maintain the quality and quantity of food produced by farmers worldwide. Various strategies exist to prevent, reduce, or manage plant diseases. Agronomic and horticultural methods depend on chemical fertilisers and insecticides. These agricultural inputs have contributed significantly to recent gains in crop output and quality. Microbial enzymes help bacteria multiply in a specific habitat by acting as biocatalysts for biochemical processes. It has long been recognised that rhizosphere microorganisms may boost plant development and suppress phytopathogens. Rhizosphere microorganisms may help plants fight phytopathogens in numerous ways. Excreting lytic enzymes is one of the acknowledged biocontrol methods for preventing phytopathogens from surviving in the rhizosphere. To combat phytopathogens, rhizosphere microbes create chitinases, cellulases, proteases, and glucanases. Biological management may soon replace fungicides, say UBC researchers. New molecular approaches are now available to study antagonist-pathogen interactions, rhizosphere antagonist ecology, and biocontrol agent efficacy. Because agro-ecosystems are dynamic structures with numerous factors affecting disease and crop productivity, alternative IPM strategies to manage crop diseases are useful in various environments. Diverse crop systems need IPM management options other than biological control to successfully prevent disease development and yield loss.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Asghar H. and Mohammad P. (2010). Review on Biological Control of Fungal Plant Pathogens Using Microbial Antagonists. Journal of Biological Sciences, 10: 273-290

Bargabus R. L., Zidack N.K., Sherwood J.E. and Jacobsen B.J. (2003). Oxidative burst elicited by Bacillus mycoides isolate biological control agent, occurs independently of hypersensitive cell death in sugar beet. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 16: 1145-1153.

Bent E. (2006). Induced systemic resistance mediated by Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Fungi (PGPF), In: Multigenic and induced systemic resistance in plants. Springer.New-York. Tuzun, S., Bent, E. (eds), pp. 225-258.

Fravel D. (2005). Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 43: 337-359.

BCC Research (2018) Global markets for enzymes in industrial applications. Business Communications Company (BCC) Inc., Norwalk, CT.

Sahai A, Manocha M (1993) Chitinases of fungi and plants: their involvement in morphogenesis and host—parasite interaction. FEMS Microb5iol Rev 11:317–338.

Li Z, Xia C, Wang Y, Li X, Qiao Y, Li C, Zhou J, Zhang L, Ye X, Huang Y, Cui Z (2019) Identification of an endo-chitinase from Corallococcus sp. EGB and evaluation of its antifungal properties. Int J Biol Macromol 132:1235–1243.

Schülein M (1988) Cellulases of Trichoderma reesei. Methods Enzymol Elsevier, pp234–242.

Parafati L, Cirvilleri G, Restuccia C, Wisniewski M (2017) Potential role of exoglucanase genes (WaEXG1 and WaEXG2) in the biocontrol activity of Wickerhamomyces anomalus. Microb Ecol 73:876–884.

Loliam B, Morinaga T, Chaiyanan S (2013) Biocontrol of Pythium aphanidermatum by the cel-lulolytic actinomycetes Streptomyces rubrolavendulae S4. Sci Asia 39:584–590.

Garcia-Carreon FL (1997) Classification of proteases without tears. Biochem Educ 25:161–167.

Clark DP, Pazdernik NJ (2016) Chapter 9: Proteomics. In: Clark DP, Pazdernik NJ (eds) Biotechnology, 2nd edn. Academic Cell, Boston, MA, pp295–333.

Banani H, Spadaro D, Zhang D, Matic S, Garibaldi A, Gullino ML (2014) Biocontrol activity of an alkaline serine protease from Aureobasidium pullulans expressed in Pichia pastoris against four postharvest pathogens on apple. Int J Food Microbiol 182:1–8.

Gueguen Y, Voorhorst WG, van der Oost J, de Vos WM (1997) Molecular and biochemical characterization of an Endo-β-1, 3-glucanase of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus. J Biol Chem 272:31258–31264.

Fridlender M, Inbar J, Chet I (1993) Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens by a β-1, 3 glucanase-producing Pseudomonas cepacia. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1211–1221

P. Mishra · S. K. Dwivedi · N. K. Arora (2020) Microbial Enzymes in Biocontrol of Phytopathogens.Microbial Enzymes: Roles and Applications in Industries.10.978-981.

Alemu Nega (2014) Review on Concepts in Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 4:27,2224-3208.

Claude Alabouvette, Chantal Olivain, Christian Steinberg. (2006) "Biological Control of Plant Diseases: The European Situation", European Journal of Plant Pathology, 114,329–341.

Pal, K. K. and B. McSpadden Gardener, (2006). Biological Control of Plant Pathogens the Plant Health Instructor.10.1117-02.

Patel, P., Shah, R., Joshi, B., Ramar, K., Natarajan, A (2019) Molecular identification and biocontrol activity of sugarcane rhizosphere bacteria against red rot pathogen Colletotrichum falcatum. Biotechnology Reports 21, e00317

Prittesh, P., Amaresan, N., Rushabh, S., Krishnamurthy, R., Bhasker, V (2016) Isolation and pathogenic variability of Colletotrichum falcatum causing red rot in sugarcane. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 123, 273-277.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-30

How to Cite

Singh, G., Kapoor, T., & Kaur, H. (2022). Current Status and Future Perspective on Enzyme Involving in Biocontrol of Plant Pathogen. Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 1(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.1.1.3

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)