Relationship between IoT Service User Quality and Network QoS Factors

Abdurauf Khamosh; Abdul Rahim Ahmadi; Mohammad Anwer; Javid Hamdard; Sadiq Aminzai; Nasratullah Nasrat

doi:10.55544/jrasb.2.2.21

Authors

Abdurauf Khamosh Department of Information System, Faculty of Computer Science, Shaikh Zayed University (SZU), Khost, AFGHANISTAN.
Abdul Rahim Ahmadi Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Computer Science, Shaikh Zayed University (SZU), Khost, AFGHANISTAN.
Mohammad Anwer Department of Information System, Faculty of Computer Science, Shaikh Zayed University (SZU), Khost, AFGHANISTAN.
Javid Hamdard Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Computer Science, Shaikh Zayed University (SZU), Khost, AFGHANISTAN.
Sadiq Aminzai Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Computer Science, Shaikh Zayed University (SZU), Khost, AFGHANISTAN.
Nasratullah Nasrat Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Computer Science, Shaikh Zayed University (SZU), Khost, AFGHANISTAN.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/jrasb.2.2.21

Keywords:

CCS Concepts, QoS Factors, IoT Services, Quality of Experience

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a complete network of networked computer devices, digital and mechanical equipment, and the capacity to send data over the Internet based on machine to machine interaction. It is also known as the Internet of Everything (IoE). The Internet is a packet-switched network, which means that the Quality of Service (QoS) elements (such as packet loss, latency, jitter, and so on) have an influence on the Quality of Experience (QoE) for the Internet of Things services. This research used a subjective evaluation method in order to evaluate the relationship between the quality of service (QoS) measures such as packet loss, latency, and jitter and the quality of experience (QoE) for Internet of Things services. In addition to that, a mapping model from quality of service to quality of experience was suggested. According to the results of this research, there is a close connection between the subjective opinion score and the quality of service (QoS) variables such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. The results of this investigation open up possibilities for additional research into the quality of experience of Internet of Things services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

C.-L. Hsu and J. C.-C. Lin, “An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: Network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 62, pp. 516–527, 2016.

R. Falcone and A. Sapienza, “On the users’ acceptance of IoT systems: A theoretical approach,” Information (Basel), vol. 9, no. 3, p. 53, 2018.

M. Atzori, “Blockchain-based architectures for the internet of things: A survey,” SSRN Electron. J., 2017.

J. Lin, W. Yu, N. Zhang, X. Yang, H. Zhang, and W. Zhao, “A survey on internet of things: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1125–1142, 2017.

B. E. El-Shweky et al., “Internet of things: A comparative study,” in 2018 IEEE 8th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), 2018.

P. Sethi and S. R. Sarangi, “Internet of Things: Architectures, protocols, and applications,” J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 2017, pp. 1–25, 2017.

M. Yang, S. Wang, R. N. Calheiros, and F. Yang, “Survey on QoE assessment approach for network service,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 48374–48390, 2018.

D. Pal and V. Vanijja, “Effect of network QoS on user QoE for a mobile video streaming service using H. 265/VP9 codec,” Procedia computer science, vol. 111, pp. 214–222, 2017.

D. Pal, V. Vanijja, and V. Varadarajan, “Quality Provisioning in the Internet of Things Era: Current State and Future Directions,” 2018, pp. 1 –7.

M. Claypool and J. Tanner, “The effects of jitter on the peceptual quality of video,” in Proceedings of the seventh ACM international conference on Multimedia (Part 2) - MULTIMEDIA ’99, 1999.

G. W. Cermak, “Multimedia quality as a function of bandwidth, packet loss, and latency,” Int. J. Speech Technol., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 259–270, 2005.

R. Amin, F. Jackson, J. E. Gilbert, J. Martin, and T. Shaw, “Assessing the impact of latency and jitter on the perceived quality of call of duty modern warfare 2,” in Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Contexts of Use, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 97–106.

S. R. Gulliver and G. Ghinea, “The perceptual and attentive impact of delay and jitter in multimedia delivery,” IEEE Trans. On Broadcast., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 449–458, 2007.

P. Paudyal, F. Battisti, and M. Carli, “Impact of video content and transmission impairments on quality of experience,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 75, no. 23, pp. 16461–16485, 2016.

T. N. Minhas, O. G. Lagunas, P. Arlos, and M. Fiedler, “Mobile video sensitivity to packet loss and packet delay variation in terms of QoE,” IEEE, 2012, pp. 83–88.

P. Itu-T, “910, Subjective Video Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications.” 2008.

“Microsoft forums,” Microsoft.com. [Online]. Available: https://social.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US. [Accessed: 20-June-2020].

H. J. Kim and S. G. Choi, “A study on a QoS/QoE correlation model for QoE evaluation on IPTV service,” 2010, vol. 2, pp. 1377–1382.